General form of registration statement for all companies including face-amount certificate companies

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

v3.2.0.727
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
3 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]    
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
All amounts are presented in U.S. Dollars.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of the Company’s stock, stock-based compensation, debt discount and the valuation allowance relating to the Company’s deferred tax assets.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
The Company maintains deposits in a financial institution which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). At various times, the Company has deposits in this financial institution in excess of the amount insured by the FDIC.
 
Marketable Securities
 
Marketable securities, which consists of U.S Treasury Bills and Certificates of Deposit, are classified as held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity securities represent those securities that the Company has both a positive intent and ability to hold the security until maturity. The Company determines the appropriate balance sheet classification of its investments at the time of purchase and evaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. 
 
The Company had $3,247,509 and $0 of held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
 
Deferred Offering Costs
 
The Company classifies amounts related to the IPO not closed as of the balance sheet date as Deferred Offering Costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company reclassified Deferred Offering Costs in the amount of $749,386 to Additional Paid-in-Capital as an offset to its IPO. 
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company incurred $30,321 of additional offering related costs. These costs were recorded as a reduction in Additional Paid-in-Capital in the accompanying condensed balance sheets.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company utilizes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
 
The carrying amounts of cash, marketable securities, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
 
Common Stock Purchase Warrants
 
The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) provides the Company with a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement) providing that such contracts are indexed to the Company's own stock. The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the Company’s control), or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other free standing derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required.  The Company’s free standing derivatives consist of warrants to purchase common stock that were issued in connection with its notes payable, warrants to purchase common stock that were issued in connection with the Company’s IPO and concurrent private placement and compensation options issued to the agent’s in the IPO exercisable for shares of common stock and common stock purchase warrants. The Company evaluated these warrants to assess their proper classification using the applicable criteria enumerated under U.S. GAAP and determined that the common stock purchase warrants meet the criteria for equity classification in the condensed balance sheet as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
 
Share-Based Payment
 
The Company accounts for share-based payments using the fair value method. For employees and directors, the fair value of the award is measured, as discussed below, on the grant date. For non-employees, fair value is generally valued based on the fair value of the services provided or the fair value of the equity instruments on the measurement date, whichever is more readily determinable and re-measured on each financial reporting dates until the service is complete. The Company has granted stock options at exercise prices no less than the fair market value as determined by the board of directors, with input from management.
 
The weighted-average fair value of options and warrants has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of each instrument is estimated on the date of grant utilizing certain assumptions for a risk free interest rate, volatility and expected remaining lives of the awards. Since the Company has a limited history of being publicly traded, the fair value of stock-based payment awards issued before the Company’s IPO  was estimated using a volatility derived from an index of comparable entities. Stock-based awards that were issued during the three months ended March 31, 2015, after the Company’s IPO,  were estimated using the volatility derived from the Company’s common stock, which was not materially different than using an index of comparable entities. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company’s stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. In estimating the Company’s forfeiture rate, the Company analyzed its historical forfeiture rate, the remaining lives of unvested options, and the number of vested options as a percentage of total options outstanding. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, or if the Company reevaluates the forfeiture rate in the future, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.
 
The weighted-average Black-Scholes assumptions are as follows:
 
 
 
For The Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
 
2015
 
 
2014
 
Expected life
 
 
2 years
 
 
 
1 year
 
Risk free interest rate
 
 
0.65
%
 
 
0.13
%
Expected volatility
 
 
80
%
 
 
132
%
Expected dividend yield
 
 
0
%
 
 
0
%
 
As of March 31, 2015, total unrecognized stock option compensation expense is $838,163, which will be recognized as those options vest over a period of approximately four years. The amount of future stock option compensation expense could be affected by any future option grants or by any option holders leaving the Company before their grants are fully vested.
 
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock
 
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other instruments to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.  Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive and consist of the following:
 
 
 
March 31,
 
March 31,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
Warrants
 
 
7,936,391
 
 
36,542
 
Options
 
 
3,340,959
 
 
163,971
 
Convertible notes
 
 
-
 
 
210,000
 
Totals
 
 
11,277,350
 
 
410,513
 
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Recent accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future a date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.
Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
All amounts are presented in U.S. Dollars.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of the Company’s stock, stock-based compensation, debt discount and the valuation allowance relating to the Company’s deferred tax assets.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
The Company maintains deposits in a financial institution which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). At various times, the Company has deposits in this financial institution in excess of the amount insured by the FDIC.
 
Deferred Offering Costs
 
The Company classifies amounts related to a potential future offering not closed as of the balance sheet date as Deferred Offering Costs. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company capitalized costs in the amount of $749,386 as Deferred Offering Costs in the accompanying balance sheet. The related financing closed in January 2015 and such costs were charged to equity accordingly.
 
Cash
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any cash equivalents. The Company includes as part of Restricted Cash any assets which are contractually restricted. Restricted Cash as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, relates to proceeds received from a grant which is restricted to only certain activities of the Company (see Note 6).
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of computer and lab equipment is computed by use of the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from one to five years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the expected lives of the assets are expensed to operations, while expenditures for major upgrades to existing items are capitalized. Upon retirement or other disposition of these assets, the costs and accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and resulting gains or losses are reflected in the results of operations.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
The Company reviews for the impairment of long-lived assets on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount. The Company has not identified any such impairment losses.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company utilizes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities 
Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable 
Level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
 
The carrying amounts of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
 
Common Stock Purchase Warrants
 
The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) provides the Company with a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement) providing that such contracts are indexed to the Company's own stock. The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the Company’s control), or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company assesses classification of its common stock purchase warrants and other free standing derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required.  The Company’s free standing derivatives consist of warrants to purchase common stock that were issued in connection with its notes payable. The Company evaluated these warrants to assess their proper classification using the applicable criteria enumerated under U.S. GAAP and determined that the common stock purchase warrants meet the criteria for equity classification in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of items that have been included or excluded in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their respective financial reporting amounts (“temporary differences”) at enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
 
Management has evaluated and concluded that there were no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. The Company does not expect any significant changes in the unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date.
 
The Company classifies interest expense and any related penalties related to income tax uncertainties as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties have been recognized during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
 
Research and Development Expenses
 
The Company expenses all research and development expenses as incurred. These costs include payroll, employee benefits, supplies, contracted for lab services, depreciation and other personnel-related costs associated with product development.
 
Share-Based Payment
 
The Company accounts for share-based payments using the fair value method. For employees and directors, the fair value of the award is measured, as discussed below, on the grant date. For non-employees, fair value is generally valued based on the fair value of the services provided or the fair value of the equity instruments on the measurement date, whichever is more readily determinable and re-measured on interim financial reporting dates until the service is complete. The Company has granted stock options at exercise prices no less than the fair market value as determined by the board of directors, with input from management.
 
The weighted-average fair value of options and warrants has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of each instrument is estimated on the date of grant utilizing certain assumptions for a risk free interest rate, volatility and expected remaining lives of the awards. Since shares of the Company have not been publicly traded through December 31, 2014, the fair value of stock-based payment awards was estimated using a volatility derived from an index of comparable entities.  The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company’s stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. In estimating the Company’s forfeiture rate, the Company analyzed its historical forfeiture rate, the remaining lives of unvested options, and the number of vested options as a percentage of total options outstanding.
 
If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, or if the Company reevaluates the forfeiture rate in the future, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.
 
The weighted-average Black-Scholes assumptions are as follows:
 
 
 
 
For The Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
 
2013
 
Expected life
 
 
6 years
 
 
N/A
 
Risk free interest rate
 
 
2.37
%
 
N/A
 
Expected volatility
 
 
80
%
 
N/A
 
Expected dividend yield
 
 
0
%
 
N/A
 
 
As of December 31, 2014, total unrecognized stock option compensation expense is $826,688, which will be recognized as those options vest over a period of approximately four years. The amount of future stock option compensation expense could be affected by any future option grants or by any option holders leaving the Company before their grants are fully vested.
 
Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock
 
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other instruments to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.  Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive and consist of the following:
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
 
2014*
 
 
2013
 
Preferred Stock Series B
 
 
5,400,000
 
 
-
 
Warrants
 
 
933,617
 
 
15,596
 
Options
 
 
2,609,811
 
 
163,971
 
Totals
 
 
8,943,428
 
 
179,567
 
 
*  December 31, 2014, excludes the impact of the 2,700,000 shares underlying the put agreements discussed in Note 10 in which the Company exercised its rights under such agreements on October 17, 2014. The 2,700,000 shares were held in escrow as of December 31, 2014 (see Note 12).
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.” This ASU removes the definition of a development stage entity from the ASC, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from GAAP. In addition, the ASU eliminates the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholders’ deficit, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. ASU 2014-10 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014. ASU 2014-10 does allow early adoption for entity’s that have not yet issued financial statements. The Company has early adopted ASU 2014-10 and reflected this adoption in its financial statement presentation contained herein.
 
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
 
In August 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which requires management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for each annual and interim reporting period.  If substantial doubt exists, additional disclosure is required.  This new standard will be effective for the Company for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
Recent accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future a date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.